|
On May 7, 2009, the Obama
Administration released budget documents that fill in details of the
broad $3.4 trillion outline for federal spending put forth in February
of this year. Congress passed the over-arching budget limit on April 29,
2009. However, the recent budget documents set program-by-program
requests for individual spending levels for the approximately 40 percent
of the budget controlled by Congress. The administration's spending
proposals do not carry the weight of law as they will have to survive
the Congressional appropriations process.
Under the budget request,
the Department of Education would receive $46.7 billion in Fiscal Year
2010, as compared to the $45.4 billion allocated during Fiscal Year
2009. However, this modest increase becomes all the more meaningful when
one factors in the more than $100 billion included for education
initiatives under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act signed into
law earlier this year.
For a more detailed
explanation of funding levels in the Obama Administration's proposed
budget for Fiscal Year 2010, please see the following table developed by
National PTA's Office of Public Policy. Though this table does not
include every child-related program in the federal budget, it provides
an overview of the President's budget as it relates to PTA's key policy
priority areas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
National
School Lunch Program |
$8.4 billion |
$9.1 billion |
$9.8 billion |
|
NSLP
Equipment Grants funding under the American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act (ARRA) |
|
$100 million |
|
|
School
Breakfast Program |
$2.4 billion |
$2.6 billion |
$2.9 billion |
|
Child
and Adult Care Feeding Program |
$2.2 billion |
$2.5 billion |
$2.7 billion |
|
Summer
Food Service Program |
$312 million |
$358 million |
$376 million |
|
Special
Milk Program |
$15 million |
$15 million |
$14 million |
|
Commodity Procurement |
$632 million |
$741 million |
$793 million |
|
Team
Nutrition |
$13 million |
$15 million |
$15 million |
|
Fresh
Fruit and Vegetable Program |
|
$112 million |
$101 million |
|
Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants and Children
(WIC) |
$6 billion |
$6.9 billion |
$7.8 billion |
|
WIC
Appropriation under ARRA |
|
$500 million |
|
|
Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) |
$39.8 billion |
$53.9 billion |
$61.3 billion |
|
SNAP
Appropriation under ARRA |
|
$5.2 billion |
$5.9 billion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Children's Mental Health |
$102 million |
$109 million |
$125 million |
|
Vaccines
for Children |
$2.7 billion |
$3.4 billion |
$3.3 billion |
|
State
Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP or S-CHIP) |
$6.4 billion |
$10.6 billion |
$12.5 billion |
|
Performance Bonus for CHIP under ARRA |
|
$3.2 billion |
|
|
Child
Health Quality Improvement for CHIP under ARRA |
|
$45 million |
$45 million |
|
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families |
$17.1 billion |
$17.1 billion |
$17.1 billion |
|
Promoting Safe and Stable Families |
$428 million |
$443 million |
$443 million |
|
Child
Care and Development Block Grant payments to States |
$2.1 billion |
$2.1 billion |
$2.1 billion |
|
Child
Care and Development Block Grant payments to States funding under
ARRA |
|
$2 billion |
|
|
Social
Services Block Grant |
$2.3 billion |
$1.7 billion |
$1.7 billion |
|
Head
Start |
$6.9 billion |
$8.5 billion |
$7.2 billion |
|
Head
Start funding under ARRA |
|
$1 billion |
|
|
Early
Head Start funding under ARRA |
|
$1.1 billion |
|
|
Community Services Block Grant |
$654 million |
$760 million |
$760 million |
|
Community Services Block Grant funding under ARRA |
|
$1 billion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grants
to Local Education Agencies |
$13.3 billion |
$21.6 billion |
$13 billion |
|
Grants
to Local Education Agencies under ARRA |
|
$13 billion |
|
|
School
Improvement Grants |
$556 million |
$606 million |
$4.5 billion |
|
Title I
Early Childhood Grants |
|
|
$500 million |
|
Early
Learning Challenge Fund |
|
|
$300 million |
|
Early
Reading First |
$112 million |
$113 million |
$163 million |
|
Striving
Readers |
$28 million |
$76 million |
$376 million |
|
Reading
First State Grants |
$448 million |
$16 million |
|
|
Even
Start |
$66 million |
$69 million |
|
|
High
School Graduation Initiative |
|
|
$50 million |
|
Impact
Aid |
$1.2 billion |
$1.3 billion |
$1.3 billion |
|
Impact
Aid under ARRA |
|
$100 million |
|
|
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants |
$2.9 billion |
$2.7 billion |
$2.9 billion |
|
21st
Century Community Learning Centers |
$1.1 billion |
$1.1 billion |
$1.1 billion |
|
Education for Homeless Children and Youth |
$64 million |
$135 million |
$65 million |
|
Emergency Fund for Homeless Students |
|
$15 million |
|
|
State
Grants under State Fiscal Stabilization Fund (under ARRA) |
|
$43.7 billion |
$4.9 billion |
|
Race-to-the-top Incentive Grants under ARRA |
|
$14 million |
$4.3 billion |
|
The What
Works and innovation Fund under ARRA |
|
|
$760 million |
|
Teacher
Incentive Fund |
$97 million |
$97 million |
$717 million |
|
Charter
School Grants |
$203 million |
$208 million |
$260 million |
|
Parental
Information and Resource Centers |
$39 million |
$39 million |
$39 million |
|
State
Grants for Safe Schools and Citizenship Education |
$296 million |
$298 million |
|
|
National
Activities for Safe Schools and Citizenship Education |
$137 million |
$145 million |
$251 million |
|
Mentoring Program for Safe Schools and Citizenship Education |
$49 million |
$48 million |
|
|
Character Education |
$24 million |
$12 million |
|
|
Elementary and Secondary School Counseling |
$49 million |
$52 million |
$52 million |
|
Physical
Education Program |
$76 million |
$76 million |
$76 million |
|
Civic
Education |
$32 million |
$33 million |
|
|
English
Language Acquisition Programs |
$764 million |
$736 million |
$730 million |
|
IDEA
State Grants |
$9.6 billion |
$21.1 billion |
$11.5 billion |
|
IDEA
Preschool Grants |
$377 million |
$774 million |
$374 million |
|
IDEA
Grants for Infants and Families |
$445 million |
$939 million |
$439 million |
|
Total
IDEA Funding under ARRA included in
above IDEA budget |
|
$12.2 billion |
|
|
Vocational Rehabilitation State Grants |
$2.9 billion |
$3.5 billion |
$3.1 billion |
|
Career
and Technical Education |
$1.3 billion |
$1.3 billion |
$1.3 billion |
|
Adult
Education |
$569 million |
$589 million |
$641 million |
|
Federal
Pell Grants |
$18.2 billion |
$25.3 billion |
$28.6 billion |
|
Perkins
Loans |
$1.1 billion |
$1.1 billion |
$5.8 billion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention |
$0.7 million |
|
|
|
Title II
State Formula Grant |
$74.3 million |
$76 million |
$76 million |
|
Demonstration Projects |
$93.8 million |
$82 million |
$25 million |
|
Title V
� Local Delinquency Prevention |
$61.1 million |
$62 million |
$62 million |
|
Juvenile
Accountability Block Grant |
$51.7 million |
$55 million |
$55 million |
|
Mentoring Programs |
$76 million |
$80 million |
$80 million |
In April, the United
States Supreme Court took up the case of Safford School District v
Redding, regarding a 13-year-old girl who was strip-searched at school,
because she was suspected of carrying prescription-strength ibuprofen.
This is the first U.S. Supreme Court case to address the issue of strip
searches in schools.
In 2003, Savana Redding,
an 8th-grade honors student from Arizona, was strip-searched by a pair
of female school employees after another student accused Redding of
possessing prescription-strength ibuprofen, a violation of the
district's drug policy. The search subsequently revealed that Redding
was not in possession of drugs. Redding's parents sued the school
district, saying that the incident violated constitutional protections
against unreasonable searches, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the
Ninth Circuit in San Francisco affirmed this ruling in July 2008. "It
does not require a constitutional scholar to conclude that a nude search
of a 13-year-old child is an invasion of constitutional rights," wrote
Judge Kim McLane for the majority. "More than that, it is a violation of
any known principle of human dignity."
The Safford Unified School
District appealed the decision and the case went before the U.S. Supreme
Court on April 21. School-district lawyers said that the schools are "on
the front lines of a decades-long struggle against drug abuse among
students," citing federal studies showing a rise in prescription-drug
abuse among young teens. The district argued that the search was "not
excessively intrusive in light of Redding's age and sex and the nature
of her suspected infraction." Redding, now in college, said that school
officials never asked her if she had drugs before searching her and did
not take into account her academic record and lack of a disciplinary
record. She did not return to school for months after the search and
eventually transferred to another school.
This is the first Supreme
Court case to address the issue of strip searches in schools. If the
U.S. Court of Appeals ruling is affirmed, it will set an unprecedented
legal limit on the authority of school officials to search for drugs or
weapons on campus. A ruling in the case of Safford School District v
Redding is scheduled to be issued by late June.
On May 26, President Obama
nominated federal appellate judge Sonia Sotomayor to the U.S. Supreme
Court. If confirmed, Sotomayor would be the first Hispanic U.S. Supreme
Court justice and the third woman to serve on the high court.
Sotomayor's nomination will go before the Senate Judiciary Committee and
the full Senate this summer.
On May 14, 2009, the House
of Representatives passed H.R. 2187, the 21st Century Green
High-Performing Public School Facilities Act, by a vote of 275-155. This
legislation, introduced by Rep. Ben Chandler (D-KY-6), would provide
$6.4 billion for Fiscal Year 2010 in federal grant funding to local
education agencies (LEAs) for the modernization, renovation, or repair
of public school facilities.
Fifty percent of these
funds are required to go toward "green" projects in the first year, with
this allocation increasing by 10 percent in each subsequent year. In
order to qualify as "green" under this grant program, projects have to
meet the standards of at least one of the following:
-
United States Green
Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design green
building rating standards (LEED Green Building Rating System);
-
Energy Star rating
system of the U.S. Department of Energy and the U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency;
-
Green building rating
program developed by the Collaborative for High Performance Schools (CHPS
Criteria);
-
Green Building
Initiative environmental design and rating system referred to as
�Green Globes�; or
-
An equivalent program
adopted by the state or another jurisdiction with authority over the
LEA.
PTA has consistently
maintained that modern, safe, and healthy education facilities will
result in a better educated, more informed, and more productive
population, and has supported this legislation since participating in
its creation during the 110th Congress. Earlier this year, Chuck Saylors,
PTA national president-elect, participated in a briefing on Capitol Hill
to help explain the benefits of green building practices on the health
and productivity of the student population, as well as the severe need
for school modernization, renovation, and repair efforts nationwide.
While $6.4 billion is not
a small amount of money for this effort, the U.S. Government
Accountability Office (GAO) reports that K-12 schools need approximately
$112 billion to bring existing buildings up to meet minimum building
standards. It remains unclear whether the Senate will take up the
legislation this year.
Additional
materials:
Estimated Allocations to States
Estimated Allocations to School Districts
A recently released
government report has found hundreds of allegations that schoolchildren
have been abused as a result of inappropriate uses of seclusion and
restraint in classrooms. The report, compiled at the request of House
Education and Labor Committee Chairman George Miller (D-CA), found these
abuses to be widespread among both public and private schools over the
past two decades. The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO)
testified about the report's findings at a House Education and Labor
Committee hearing held on May 19.
The GAO report examined 10
of these cases in detail. Four of the examined cases resulted in death.
In half of the cases GAO studied, the teachers or school staff involved
with the abuse continued to teach, either in the same school system or a
new one. GAO also found that, more often than not, teachers and staff
who used seclusion and restraint in abusive ways had not been properly
trained. These practices were often being used as a routine disciplinary
tactic, rather than in response to an emergency.
Seclusion is defined as
the act of involuntarily confining a student in an area by him/herself.
Restraint is used to restrict an individual's freedom of movement. As
the GAO explained, restraint can become fatal when it blocks air to the
lungs. In some of the cases examined, ropes, duct tape, chairs with
straps, and bungee cords were used to restrain or isolate young
children. Unlike in hospitals, other health care facilities, and most
non-medical community-based facilities that receive federal funding,
there are currently no federal laws that restrict the use of seclusion
and restraint in public or private schools. Currently, 19 states have no
laws governing the appropriate use of seclusion and restraint in
schools. The Obama administration indicated it plans to meet with
stakeholders to address these abuses.
Read More
For more information,
please contact VP of Legislation, Rita Aggarwal at
raggarwal@hudson-pta.org.
|